Do You Have Questions After Your Car Accident – Ask The Car Accident Attorneys

Do You Have Questions After Your Car Accident – Ask The Car Accident Attorneys

Individuals who have been hurt in motor vehicle accidents often have questions. The amount of information that exists on the Internet about accidents can be overwhelming for anyone who is trying to learn more about the topic. That said, this car accident info center is intended to provide accident victims with one centralized place for them to begin to learn more about the common questions that accident victims have.

car accident attorneys - personal injury law
Personal Injury
Please click on this link @
San Antonio is a big city, but when you factor in all of the visitors that go to the city on a regular basis, the chances of a car accident occurring increase dramatically. The car accident info center is here to provide those who have been injured in auto accidents with a clearer picture of some of the legal aspects that are associated with Texas car accidents.

Individuals who have questions or concerns about a car accident that they or a loved one was involved in should contact a competent Texas car accident lawyer right away by calling us.

What Topics Will Be Discussed In The Car Accident Info Center?

Although there are many topics that can be discussed with regard to car accidents in the Texas area, the car accident info center will address a few of the more common concerns that accident victims sometimes have. The concerns to be discussed are:

What to do after a car accident: After an accident many victims are unsure of what to do next, especially if they have never been in an accident before. Drivers who are involved in accidents are required to abide by the laws of the state and take certain steps after an accident. Drivers are also encouraged to get a copy of the accident report for their own records.

Do I have a case?: The viability of an accident case depends on a number of factors that will have to be taken into consideration. A good accident attorney will be able to look at the facts of the case and assess the likelihood of a successful outcome.

Who pays for a car accident?: The issue of money and payment for injuries is a common one among accident victims. Compensation for car accidents largely depends on who was at fault. If an injured party was partly at fault for the accident, his or her compensation will be reduced accordingly. Find some additional info here @

Do I need a lawyer?: Whether or not an individual needs an attorney to handle his or her accident claim will depend on the facts of the case. Anyone who has sustained major injuries from a motor vehicle accident will likely benefit from working with a lawyer, while those who have only minor property damage might not find an attorney necessary.

How much money is my case worth?: Determining the value of a car accident case can be a difficult task, but a knowledgeable car accident attorney can guide you through the valuation process. Numerous factors will go into the determination.

All accident victims have different case facts; therefore, the answers to the above-mentioned questions will differ according to the specifics of the case.

More Questions?
Car accident victims are always advised to speak with a local attorney about their cases. An attorney can provide victims with the most accurate information possible as it relates to their specific set of facts.

Those who have questions about a car accident should call us today to schedule a consultation.

Personal Injury Lawyers : A Review of the Basis of Medical Responsibility

medical malpractice law

A Review of the Basis of Medical Responsibility

That a physician maintains a duty and thus an obligation to his/her patient is not a new concept. Writings on Medical Responsibility are traceable back over 4,000 years. The Code of Hammurabi, 2030 BC provided:

“If the doctor has treated a gentlemen with a lancet of bronze and has caused the gentleman to die, or has opened the an abscess of the eye for a gentleman with a bronze lancet, and has caused the loss of the gentleman’s eye, one shall cut off his hands.” [Smith Origin & History of Hebrew Law, (1931) 211, 212; Hughes v. State Board, (1926) 162 GA 246, 134 SE 42, 49.]

Note however, if the patient were a slave and the slave lost his life due to the wrongful conduct of the surgeon, then the penalty was furnishing the master with another slave. In those days, the duty to the patient had a direct relation to the social status. If the physician made a mistake, and a loss of life occurred, he paid a fixed penalty. More here @

Later, the Egyptians tempered this rule. If the physician followed an established means of treatment for a disease, and an unfavorable result occurred, he was exonerated. But if he departed from the acceptable procedure and treatment, and the patient had ill results, then the doctor was found at fault, and the penalty could be severe.

While the “practice of medicine” dates from the days of Hippocrates (400 B.C.), we are unaware of any writings of that day that dealt with the physician’s conduct and responsibility in relation to his patient.

However, the Greeks must have had some recognition of a duty owed by the physician to his patient for Plutarch tells the story of Glaucus, a physician of Ephesus, who left a sick man, and went to the fields. In his absence the man died because of taking excessably of food. Alexander condemned the doctor to death for a breach of professional duty. [Charles Greene Cumston, Laws Governing Civil Malpractice in the Middle Ages, 15 Green Bag, 409 (1903).] medical malpractice cases

In the Roman Law, malpractice was a recognized wrong. When Roman Law expanded and was introduced into Continental Europe around 1200 A.D., a law for the regulation of the practice of medicine, including the control of drugs, was promulgated in 1240 by Emperor Fredrick II.

In 1532, during the reign of Charles V, a law was passed providing that the opinion of medical men should be formally taken in every case of violent death. Thus, there came to be developed standards by which to judge the knowledge and skill of a physician, who was to be held responsible, not only for intentional fault, but also for negligence in the practice of his skill.

After the Norman Conquest in 1066, came the development of the English Common Law, and during the reign of Richard Coeur de Lion, at the close of the 12th century, official records were kept in the Courts of Common Law and the Plea Rolls. From these records down to the present time, there is an unbroken line of decisions concerning medical malpractice. More here @

One of the earliest recorded cases involving medical malpractice in the English Law was Everad v. Hopkins, (1615) 80 English Reports 1164. Sir Edward Coke decided an action against a physician for negligence. Plaintiff’s master had employed a physician to treat his servant. No contract was entered with the patient. However, it was found that “unwholesome medicine” had been employed, which caused the servant to become more ill. Lord Coke said that of course the master could maintain an action upon his contract, but the servant not being a party could not sue thereon. However, the opinion was stated that the servant, in his own right, could have an action on the case for the damages done by the treatment.

Thus, a legal obligation devolved upon the physician because of the universal demands put forward by society for its own protection. A review of the past legal history of medicine is important to understand the nature of the relationship of responsibility of the healer to his patient. Suffice it to say, since the first cases in which an individual prevailed against a doctor in court, the stigma for wrongdoing has attached to the doctor found culpable. This is one of the reasons that fellow-physicians were for so long unwilling to testify on behalf of those harmed by a fellow physician’s wrongful conduct. Indeed, to a certain extent, the “conspiracy of silence” still exists today. More on this site @